leffie's rants

I’d love to hear an argument against taking $80 billion away from oil corps

March 10, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Climate Progress

The bipartisan effort of Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC), John Kerry (D-MA), and Joe Lieberman (I-CT) to craft comprehensive clean energy legislation that caps global warming pollution has brought some positive words from Big Oil and their political allies.  Brad Johnson explains why in this Wonk Room repost.

In particular, the senators are considering a proposal by ConocoPhillips, BP America and ExxonMobil to exclude petroleum producers and refiners from a carbon market and instead levy a carbon fee. “Once you have oil people saying, ‘We can live with this, this was our idea,’ then hopefully everybody else begins to look at this thing anew,” Graham told reporters. “That’s the hope.” However, the American Petroleum Institute’s Jack Gerard explained that the “support” from the oil industry for a carbon fee on petroleum will come in the form of “signs at the gas pump letting people know they’re paying more because of U.S. efforts to deal with climate change”:

Industry officials said they too welcome the discussions of a carbon fee as part of the Kerry-Graham-Lieberman effort.

Clearly it softens the reaction and increases the likelihood that a number of people who’ve been forced to push back will be much more cooperative in the dialogue,” said Jack Gerard, president of the American Petroleum Institute.

Gerard said that the carbon fee approach would yield net environmental benefits, while giving consumers the most transparent signal they can get about what the costs are from the program. Unlike the House bill’s cap-and-trade system, oil companies would pass through the costs with signs at the gas pump letting people know they’re paying more because of U.S. efforts to deal with climate change.

In other words, the oil industry likes the idea of legislators embracing a carbon fee plan — a plan originally proposed by oil companies — because they’ll be able to blame “U.S. efforts to deal with climate change” on high gas prices. And that is what they’re already doing, with full-page ads in Politico and Roll Call that attack Congress for “new energy taxes”:

Congress will likely consider new taxes on America’s oil and natural gas industry. These new energy taxes will produce wide-reaching effects, and ripple through our economy when America — and Americans — can least afford it.

These unprecedented taxes will serve to reduce investment in new energy supplies at a time when most Americans support developing our domestic oil and natural gas resources. That means less energy, thousands of American jobs being lost and further erosion of our energy security.

Our economy is in crisis, and we need to get the nation on the road to economic recovery. This is no time to burden Americans with new energy costs.

The direct target of this ad is the Obama administration’s effort to remove $80 billion in loopholes and subsidies for the oil industry, which allowed them to reap windfall profits while helping destroy the American economy under Bush. Even now, rising oil markets are threatening to cripple the fragile recovery. There’s simply no evidence that these subsidies have helped necessary exploration or protected American jobs — instead they’ve fattened corporate profits at taxpayers’ expense.

If the oil industry is willing to launch false attacks on the removal of tax loopholes as “unprecedented taxes,” it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure how they’ll portray a carbon fee.

One can bet they won’t mention that even a very strong price on carbon only marginally affects consumer gas prices. Modeling by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2007 of a scenario equivalent to emissions reductions to 1990 levels by 2020 and 80% cuts by 2050 found that oil producers would pay most of the pollution fees, not consumers. In fact, after an initial rise in consumer prices in the first decade of implementation that could be offset by increased fuel economy standards, MIT projects consumer gas prices would decline:

Carbon Policy and Gas Prices

The price of gasoline has fluctuated between two and four dollars a gallon in recent years, whereas the effect of carbon policy is only cents on the gallon. Yet every cent is one that stays in the American economy going to create jobs and maintain our infrastructure, instead of flowing overseas to countries like Iran and Nigeria. Quite simply, putting a price on carbon is a fundamental threat to the power of the oil industry over the U.S. economy.

Sent with Reeder

-gl

Posted via email from brawling ennui

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Not sure where i land on this one, to each their own? Chef Daniel Angerer Defends Cheese Made From Wife’s Breast Milk

March 10, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Inhabitat

Daniel Angerer, Mommys Milk Cheese, Breastmilk cheese, Breast milk cheese

Last week, we brought you news about Chef Daniel Angerer’s special cheese made from his wife’s breast milk, and boy did that open a can of worms! While we expected knee-jerk ‘EEEWWW‘ reactions from people, we didn’t really imagine the extent to which people would get up in arms about breast milk cheese – something which in our minds is totally natural, organic, and not gross in the slightest. People got so concerned about the breastmilk cheese issue that apparently the New York Department of Health came to pay Angerer a visit over the weekend.

Well you can rest assured that Angerer’s “My Spouse’s Mommy Milk Cheese” is not being sold to the public at his restaurant, Klee Brasserie – he confirmed that on the radio today. But we still don’t see what is so awful or scary about the idea of serving, local, organic, healthy cheese made from breast milk. How is this any less gross than eating cheese that came from the manure-covered teat of a factory-farmed, hormone-laden, antibiotics laden cow? After all, you have to admit that when it comes to foods that are organic, local, natural and free, human breast milk ticks all the boxes. And, remember, the stuff is naturally DESIGNED to be the ultimate human sustenance. So what do you think? Would you eat cheese made of human breast milk?

READ MORE AT INHABITOTS >


Permalink | Add to del.icio.us | digg
Post tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sent with Reeder

-gl

Posted via email from brawling ennui

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Digital and analog find common ground in the 4N watch

March 9, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Digital and analog find common ground in the 4N watch

In the world of overpriced, limited-edition watches, it takes a lot of work to stand out from the crowd. This 4N watch does so by having all of the numbers on independent dials that rotate the time into place, cleverly combining digital and analog timekeeping.

Of course, with a production run limited to 16 units, this is going to be one expensive timepiece. But hey, dials! That’s fun, right?

A Blog to Read via BornRich

 

I’m a watch geek, and this looks pretty cool if I do say so myself. With a production run of 16, I’m sure it will be in the 10’s if not 100’s of thousands. Meh.

Posted via web from brawling ennui

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Tron Legacy – are you kidding me? I’m totally geeked for this show, I really hope it lives up to the impossible hype that will surround it.

March 9, 2010 · Leave a Comment

To be honest, I can't recall the plot from the first movie, but the plot was really secondary to the effects.  I'm pumped up to see the new one … and I have added the original to my Netflix queue to reacquaint myself with it.  I'm guessing that it doesn't really hold up after all these years, but who cares right?  It's geekdom to the max.

Posted via email from brawling ennui

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Downloaded foursquare update (1.6.1) but no changes to UI. Bummer.

March 9, 2010 · Leave a Comment

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Any of my social media peeps using ”mytown’?

March 8, 2010 · Leave a Comment

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Solar breakthrough: Water to hydrogen with 60% efficiency

March 8, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Solar breakthrough: Water to hydrogen with 60% efficiency

British scientists say they’ve achieved a breakthrough, figuring out how to extract hydrogen from water with an unheard-of 60% efficiency using solar energy. The secret sauce is nanotechnology, in the form of nanoclusters of indium phosphide encrusted on a gold electrode. Using this, they can turn sunlight into that hotshot hydrogen fuel, clean-burning and as energetic as a swift kick in the ass.

Next trick: turning water into wine.

What’s the catch? Well, gold happens to be exorbitantly expensive, and becoming more so as markets become less stable. So these guys are looking for a way to make this miraculous alchemy occur without using precious metals. In fact, the researchers say there’s “no special reason to use gold or platinum,” and mentioned the gold just “happened to be lying about the lab.” Apparently there’s tremendous amounts of money involved in hydrogen research.

Hey, this could be useful for fueling that Bloom Box, eliminating the need for propane and making it actually practical.

Via Treehugger

 

Another potential awesome step forward in “clean” energy. Hope some of these things start to hit the mainstream. See the note at the end of the blog regarding using this with the Bloom Box … mmm … decentralized energy.

Could this tool potentially use wastewater as it’s feedstock? :)

Posted via web from brawling ennui

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Rejoice Fiursquare fans!! New Version of Foursquare for iPhone Coming Soon [SCREENSHOTS]

March 6, 2010 · Leave a Comment

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

A photos from the road restrospective. All but one were taken while stopped.

March 6, 2010 · Leave a Comment

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Chloe’s volcano cake: 3 layers of choco cake surrounded by choco frosting. Mmm. ((tag: food, chloe, greg)

March 6, 2010 · Leave a Comment

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized